-
ITAT - Determines Non-taxability of Advertising Rights Payment as Royalty in Cricket Tournaments by considering LoB Clause Applicability.
Total Sports & Entertainment India P. Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31263 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
ITAT - Upholds Reassessment of Wealth Tax, Considers Assessee as 'Owner' of Land without Fulfillment of Conditions under Section 53A of TPA
Triad Resorts and Hotels (P.) Ltd Vs WTO
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31262 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
-
Witholding of refund due to OYO Hotels & Homes Pvt. Ltd. by the Revenue is bereft of cogent reasons, thus not sustainable.
OYO Hotels And Homes Private Limited Vs DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31261 (HC-DELHI)
-
The payment to the UAE based service provider are in the nature of technical services and not royalty.
Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd Vs The Dy. CIT
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31260 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
The delay of just one day in uploading the assessment order or generating the DIN cannot make the assessment order unsustainable in law.
Prakash Lal Khandelwal Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31236 (HC-JHARKHAND)
-
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 cannot be justified on hypothesis of a future event.
World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited Vs The DCIT
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31235 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
The addition on account of interest of Rs.68.49 Cr @ 22% as directed by the DRP is unsustainable.
CPI India Real Estate Ventures Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31228 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
The activities carried out by Gujarat Council of Science City are not in the nature of imparting education by general public utility.
Gujarat Council of Science City Vs DCIT
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31227 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
The date of the Panchnama last drawn would be the relevant date for considering the period of limitation of two years and not the last date of authorisation.
Anil Minda and Others Vs Commissioner of Income Tax
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31220 (SC)
-
CIT(E) is not vested with any power to condone delay in filing application for grant of approval under section 10(23C)(vi).
Manav Rachana Education Society Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31219 (ITAT-RAIPUR) · Section 10(23C)(vi)
-
Though this Special Bench judgment referred to supra has been rendered in the context of pre-Securities Transaction Tax (STT) era, still the analogy drawn thereon would be applicable to the facts of the instant case.
J.P. Morgan Fund Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (IT)
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31218 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Assessee must be given an opportunity of being heard before rejecting the application seeking immunity from penalty proceedings.
Rohit Kapur Vs PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31217 (HC-DELHI)
-
Where the final assessment order is passed beyond prescribed time limit the same is liable to be quashed.
APM Terminals India Private Limited Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31216 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 144C(13)
-
Provision of IBC shall have an overriding effect over all other laws, accordingly, it can be concluded that provisions of IBC would prevail over Income Tax Act.
Sumeet Industries Ltd Vs The DCIT
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31215 (ITAT-SURAT) · Section 156A
-
Revenue’s approach of making observations based on Assessee’s distributor partners, does not meet the parameter set forth in Rule 28AA for estimating Assessee’s income and is thus erroneous.
Milestone Systems A/S Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31214 (HC-DELHI)
-
The Assessee rightly computed taxable income in compliance with ICDS by negating the adjustments made for disclosure of financial assets and liabilities as per IND-AS.
Shriram Properties Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31207 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
The impugned assessment order is a classical example as to how an assessment should not be made. This leaves us with no other option except to quash the assessment order.
Indu Goenka Vs ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT & Ors
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31200 (HC-CALCUTTA)
-
Gift of house to father just prior to sale of land was a camouflage to claim Section 54F deduction as the Assessee owned two house properties.
Rachit V Shah Vs ITO-7(3)
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31199 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 54F
-
CC Ltd is eligible to claim additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) on the assets acquired in earlier AY.
ACC Limited Vs Addl. CIT – LTU
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31192 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
The activity of assessee cannot be said to be a mere work-contract. It is in the nature of development of project and hence the assessee has rightly claimed the deduction meant for developers.
Shreenathji Infrastructure (P) Ltd Vs ACIT
(2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31191 (ITAT-INDORE) · Section 80-IA(4)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.