Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,400 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·Karnataka High Court · 16 Jun 2023
    The notice and assessment order passed in the name of non-existing company is a substantive illegality and without jurisdiction.

    Coffee Day Resorts (MSM) Pvt. Ltd Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31760 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  2. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 15 Jun 2023
    While determining the question of setting up of business, the nature of business undertaken by the Assessee is required to be examined.

    Honda Access India Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31753 (ITAT-DELHI)

  3. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 15 Jun 2023
    The royalty received from foreign OEMs cannot be taxed under Section 9(1)(vi)(c).

    Qualcomm Incorporated USA Vs DCIT

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31752 (ITAT-DELHI)

  4. Direct Tax ·AP High Court · 14 Jun 2023
    The Assessee is entitled to the refund of credit of advance tax and TDS due to migration of credit from the merged company to the successor company.

    Virtusa Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd Vs Income Tax of Department

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31751 (HC-AP)

  5. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 14 Jun 2023
    The assessment order mentioned that the notice under Section 142(1) was issued and served, but if the Assessee contends non-service of such notice, she is required to prove during trial.

    Kamla Rani Vs Income Tax Officer

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31744 (HC-DELHI)

  6. Direct Tax ·ITAT Kolkata · 14 Jun 2023
    Power exercised under Section 251 is without jurisdiction, thus the additions made by exercising such power are to be deleted.

    Apeejay Shipping Ltd Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31743 (ITAT-KOLKATA)

  7. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 13 Jun 2023
    The alleged on-money paid from Assessee’s funds from Muscat cannot be taxed under Section 69 as per Article 24 of India-Oman DTAA.

    Vijaykumar Kanaiyalal Matta Vs Income Tax Officer

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31736 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 69

  8. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 12 Jun 2023
    The joint ownership of the property would not stand in the way of claiming exemption under Section 54F.

    Zainul Abedin Ghaswala Vs CIT(A)

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31729 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  9. Direct Tax ·Calcutta High Court · 12 Jun 2023
    The extreme repercussions of issuing LOC should be regulated and should not be made the norm for recovery of outstanding payments to the Bank, Isolated and few-and-far between cases of persons fleeing the country cannot become the uniform rationale for issuing of Look Out Circulars.

    Mannoj Kumar Jain & Anr Vs Union of India & Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31728 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  10. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 10 Jun 2023
    Penalty paid for late filing of profession tax return is penal in nature and cannot be considered as a compensatory to allow deduction under Section 37(1).

    Shriram Chits Maharashtra Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31721 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 37(1)

  11. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 10 Jun 2023
    Merely because the membership is taken in the name of the director, it cannot be said that Assessee won’t get the benefit of the membership of the director.

    New Globe Logistik Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31720 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  12. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 10 Jun 2023
    Assessee’s claim is allowable as the claim of deduction under Section 80-IC was made before completion of assessment procedure, which fulfils the directory requirement.

    Canadian Specialty Vinyls Vs ITO

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31719 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 80-IC

  13. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 10 Jun 2023
    The interest income received by the Assessee on temporary short term fixed deposits is eligible for exemption under Section 10AA.

    Allstate India Private Limited Vs DCIT

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31718 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 10AA

  14. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 09 Jun 2023
    The Assessee is a tax resident of Mauritius and is legally entitled to DTAA benefits on the strength of the TRC issued by the Mauritian authorities.

    Sapein Funds Ltd Vs CIT(International Taxation)

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31711 (ITAT-DELHI)

  15. Direct Tax ·Calcutta High Court · 09 Jun 2023
    The burden of proving that a particular sale is benami and the apparent purchaser is not the real owner, always rests on the person asserting it to be so.

    Sekhar Kumar Roy Vs Smt. Lila Roy & Another

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31710 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  16. Direct Tax ·ITAT Chennai · 08 Jun 2023
    Merely for the reason that there is a violation of certain notifications issued by the Government in transacting with specified bank notes, the genuine explanation offered by the assessee towards source for cash deposit cannot be rejected.

    Purani Hospital Supplies Private Limited Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31703 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  17. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 07 Jun 2023
    There was no response from the Assessee on proposal of refund adjustment which the Assessee contradicts by submitting that a 30 days period was provided by the Revenue but the adjustment was made prior to the expiry of 30 days.

    Travelport International Operations Limited Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31696 (HC-DELHI)

  18. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 07 Jun 2023
    Levy of penalty suffers from vice of non-application of mind as well as violates principles of natural justice.

    Saltwater Studio LLP Vs NFAC

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31695 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 270A(9)

  19. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 07 Jun 2023
    Unless the Revenue is able to prove that the assessee has a PE in India, its business profits cannot be subject to tax in India.

    Baker Hughes Energy Technologies UK Ltd Vs ACIT

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31694 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 44BB

  20. Direct Tax ·ITAT Ahmedabad · 06 Jun 2023
    Though the advances qualified as deemed dividend in terms of Section 2(22)(e), they cannot be taxed in the hands of the Assessee, not being shareholder of the concerns lending the sum.

    Aaryavart Infrastructure P. Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2023) TaxCorp(LJ) 31687 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.