Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,966 rulings

  1. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    Fundamental principles of accrual of income under mercantile system of accounting explained in the context of waiver of income recoverable from person facing financial difficulties

    CIT. vs. Neon Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10130 (HC-BOMBAY)

  2. ITAT Chennai · 20 Apr 2016
    ITAT - Developer did not get building plan approved from competent authority, which is of utmost importance for implementation of JDA. Capital gains addition made on the basis of JDA entered by assessee to be deleted.

    Coromandel Cables Pvt Ltd. vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10129 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  3. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    Failure by ITAT to grant an adjournment requested due to bereavement results in breach of principles of natural justice

    Zuari Global Ltd. vs. Pr. CIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10128 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    S. 14A/ Rule 8D: Non-consideration by the ITAT of a judgement of the co-ordinate Bench makes the order a non-speaking one and breaches the principles of natural justice

    DSP Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10127 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 14A

  5. Bombay High Court · 20 Apr 2016
    Mere non-introduction of interest-bearing funds is not sufficient to conclude that gains from sale of shares are not business income

    Pine Tree Finserve Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10126 (HC-BOMBAY)

  6. Supreme Court · 19 Apr 2016
    SC - SLP Dismissed - “Wheeling charges” was not taxable as FTS u/s 194J.

    CIT-TDS. vs. Delhi Transco Ltd.

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10125 (SC) · Section. 194J

  7. Supreme Court · 19 Apr 2016
    SC - SLP Dismissed - Surrender of Floor Area Ratio relating to land in favour of developer for construction of flats is transfer u/s 2(47).

    Dinesh Rankha vs. CIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10124 (SC)

  8. Supreme Court · 18 Apr 2016
    Important law on concept of "ancestral property" under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the formation of a HUF by the surviving members of the deceased explained

    Uttam vs. Saubhag Singh

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10123 (SC)

  9. ITAT Cochin · 18 Apr 2016
    S. 80-IB(7): Amounts by way of rent and other misc items, though shown as "other income" in the books, constitutes "key revenue category" as per ICAI Guidelines and are "derived" from the business of the hotel

    Kumarakom Lake Resort Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10122 (ITAT-COCHIN) · Section 80-IB(7)

  10. AAR · 18 Apr 2016
    AAR - Provision of coring services under a sub-contract, taxable at concessional rate u/s 44BB.

    Corpro Systems Limited UK

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10121 (AAR) · Section. 44BB

  11. Madras High Court · 19 Apr 2016
    HC - Payment to Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Limited for executing 99 years land lease deed is not rent. No TDS u/s 194I.

    TRIL Inforpark Limited vs. ITO

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10120 (HC-MADRAS) · Section. 194I

  12. Bombay High Court · 18 Apr 2016
    HC - Since conduct of petitioner not being forthcoming, this is not a fit case to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction in foreign asset reassesment case.

    Soignee R. Kothari vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10119 (HC-BOMBAY)

  13. ITAT Mumbai · 15 Apr 2016
    Transfer Pricing Of Corporate Guarantees: Explanation i(c) to S. 92 B, though stated to be clarificatory and stated to be effective from 01.04.2002, has to be necessarily treated as effective from at best AY 2013-14 as it is an "anti abuse" provision. Dept’s submission that Bharti Airtel 161 TTJ 428 is “per incuriam” is not acceptable. Law laid down in Micro Ink 176 TTJ 8 (Ahd) on transfer pricing implications of corporate guarantees reiterated

    Siro Clinpharm Private Limited vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10118 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 92B

  14. ITAT Mumbai · 15 Apr 2016
    Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules which regulates the admission of additional evidence by the CIT(A) cannot override the principles of natural justice

    Avan Gidwani vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10117 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  15. ITAT Mumbai · 15 Apr 2016
    ITAT - Confirmation of demand raised under section 201, cannot be the sole criteria for imposing penalty under section 271C.

    Aishwarya Rai Bachchan vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10116 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sctions. 201, 271C

  16. ITAT Kolkata · 15 Apr 2016
    ITAT - Depreciation at the rate of 60% prescribed for “computers including computer software” on ATM machines.

    The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V vs. DDIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10115 (ITAT-KOLKATA)

  17. Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2016
    HC - Letting out premises by trust to educational institute for rent is in consonance with object of “advancement of education”. First proviso to Sec. 2(15) is inapplicable.

    DIT(Exemptions) vs. Lala Lajpatrai Memorial Trust

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10114 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 2(15)

  18. ITAT Agra · 15 Apr 2016
    S. 147/ 148: Law laid down in Jet Airways India 331 ITR 236 and Ranbaxy 336 ITR 136 that if AO does not make any addition for the reason stated for reopening, he cannot add any other income holds good even for years when Explanation 3 to s. 147 is operative

    Anugrah Varshney vs. ITO

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10113 (ITAT-AGRA) · Sections 147, 148

  19. Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2016
    S. 147: Though assessee claims that she is a non-resident & that onus is on the revenue to show that the money in the HSBC Geneva account is taxable in India, the non-cooperation with the Revenue by signing the consent waiver form shows that she has something to hide and makes it an unfit case for exercise of writ jurisdiction

    Soignee R. Kothari vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10112 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 147

  20. ITAT Bangalore · 14 Apr 2016
    ITAT - Remedy against the order passed under Section 195(2) does not lie before the appellate authorities by filing the appeal for want of jurisdiction

    Bangalore International Airport Limited vs. ITO

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10111 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section. 195(2)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.