Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,912 rulings

  1. ITAT Kolkata · 06 Mar 2017
    ITAT - On the very same material which was available when the original assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) were completed, the AO has sought to reopen the assessment proceedings u/s 148 merely on the basis of change of opinion.

    D.C.I. T-Circle-1, Circle-1 (2) , Kolkata Versus M/s. Gloster Jute Mills Ltd. and Vice-Verssa

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12285 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=54807&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  2. ITAT Kolkata · 06 Mar 2017
    ITAT - If deposit of unutilized capital gain is made within the time limit made in Sec.139(4) of the Act, the deduction u/s 54G cannot be denied.

    D.C.I.T. Circle-6, Kolkata Versus M/s. Kilburn Engineering Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12284 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=54809&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  3. Delhi High Court · 06 Mar 2017
    ITAT - Deduction of expenditure incurred in earning income u/s 56 allowed where the source is inextricable to the nature of the expenditure.

    Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-21 Versus The Mantola Cooperative Thrift & Cradit Society Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12283 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68587&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  4. Gujarat High Court · 04 Mar 2017
    HC - Entire issue was gone into by AO while framing scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3), thereafter reopening on very same issue is only a change of opinion, which is not permissible.

    Manan Exports (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12281 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68407&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  5. ITAT Pune · 04 Mar 2017
    ITAT - Cost related to replacement of old machines with new ones, was to be excluded from operating margin under transfer pricing, it being an extraordinary item event.

    Tetra Pak India (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Pune

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12280 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=54787&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  6. Bombay High Court · 04 Mar 2017
    HC - Condition precedent under section 153C not satisfied where seized documents did not belong to assessee.

    Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-III, Mumbai v. Arpit Land (P.) Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12279 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68427&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  7. Karnataka High Court · 04 Mar 2017
    HC - Even though shares were determinable amongst beneficiaries, income cannot be taxed in hands of beneficiaries for their share of income and not in hands of Trustees. Therefore, tax on trustees at maximum marginal rate treating them as AOP was not valid.

    Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru v. India Advantage Fund-VII

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12278 (HC-KARNATAKA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68449&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  8. ITAT Delhi · 04 Mar 2017
    ITAT - Rent equalization reserve debited to Profit and Loss Account should be added back while computing book profit u/s 115JB.

    Stryker Global Technology Center (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-9(1), New Delhi

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12277 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=54786&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. Gujarat High Court · 04 Mar 2017
    HC - Since entire amount due and payable under certificate for which property was attached was paid along with interest, transfer of attached property not void.

    Nitaben Harishbhai Shah v. Tax Recovery Officer-I

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12276 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68406&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  10. Delhi High Court · 03 Mar 2017
    HC - Writ Dismissed - ITAT has powers to direct production of file u/s 124 in respect of transfer order passed u/s 127.

    Pr. CIT. Vs. ITAT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12275 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 127

  11. ITAT Kolkata · 03 Mar 2017
    ITAT - No TDS u/s 195 TDS on software payments to a Singaporean company as the same not royalty under Article 12(3) of India-Singapore DTAA. Assessee has a right to use the computer software but no right to use copyright in the computer software.

    I.T.C. Limited vs. ADIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12274 (ITAT-KOLKATA)

  12. Madras High Court · 03 Mar 2017
    HC - Capital gains even though forming part of net profit in the P&L account, should be excluded while computing book profits for the purposes of MAT u/s. 115JB. Further, assessee will be entitled to relief u/s 54EC on said capital gains.

    Metal & Chromium Plater (P) Ltd. Vs. CIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12273 (HC-MADRAS) · Sections. 115JB, 54EC

  13. ITAT Kolkata · 02 Mar 2017
    ITAT - Retention money to be excluded from book profits for the purposes of MAT calculation u/s. 115JB.

    Mcnally Bharat Engg. Co. Ltd. Vs. DCIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12272 (ITAT-KOLKATA)

  14. Gujarat High Court · 02 Mar 2017
    HC - Writ Dismissed - A director holding 98% shareholding in a public limited company is in default for company’s income-tax dues by lifting the corporate veil. Sec. 179 applicable by treating the company as 'de facto' private company.

    Ajay Surendra Patel vs. DCIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12271 (HC-GUJARAT)

  15. Bombay High Court · 03 Mar 2017
    HC - Amount paid by assessee to a professional interior designer to plan temporary access and exit from the Five Star Hotel is allowable u/s 37(1) as revenue expenditure.

    Commissioner of Income Tax-2 Versus M/s. Seaprincess Hotels and Properties Pvt. Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12269 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68526&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  16. ITAT Kolkata · 03 Mar 2017
    ITAT - Assessee is old aged and disclosure of amounts in revised and payment of taxes thereon and taking into consideration the submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) is cancelled.

    Dr. Kalyan Chaudhuri Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 19 (3) , Kolkata

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12267 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=54782&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. ITAT Kolkata · 03 Mar 2017
    ITAT - Where delay in appointment of auditors was by the co-operative department, no penalty u/s 271B as appointment is not in the control of the assessee.

    Arambagh Co-op Agricultural Marketing Society Ltd Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1, West Bengal

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12266 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=54781&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  18. ITAT Visakhapatnam · 03 Mar 2017
    ITAT - Explanations of the assessee that he has declared additional income to buy peace and to come out of vexed litigation could be treated as bonafide, therefore penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied.

    K. Sai Rama Krishnam Raju Versus DCIT, Circle-3 (1) , Visakhapatnam and K. Saritha Versus DCIT, Circle-3 (1) , Visakhapatnam

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12265 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=54778&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  19. Bombay High Court · 02 Mar 2017
    HC - Authorities not to cancel the registration of the Charitable Institution only because the proviso to Section 2(15) comes into play as the receipts are in excess of the specified limits therein.

    Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Versus The North Indian Association

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12264 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68557&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  20. Bombay High Court · 02 Mar 2017
    HC - No penalty u/s 271D for violating provision of section 269SS where amount received by the wife in cash from the husband by bonafide believing that the said amount need not have routed to her vide a bank transaction.

    Smt. Nirmala w/o Surendra Jain Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Officer

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 12263 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68570&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.