Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,882 rulings

  1. ITAT Pune · 05 Sep 2017
    ITAT - Deduction u/s. 80P is available to a credit cooperative society in respect of additions made u/s. 68.

    Aman Chote Vyapari Vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13496 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 80P

  2. Calcutta High Court · 05 Sep 2017
    HC - Definition of legal representative as provided in Sec. 2(11) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and as understood in the context of Sec. 2(29) of the Income Tax Act is an inclusive, wider in scope and not confined to legal heir only and will include severed relationship with deceased father.

    Arvind Kayan vs. Union Of India & Ors

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13495 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  3. ITAT Delhi · 06 Sep 2017
    ITAT - A charitable institution which has treated amount spent on purchase of capital asset as application of income, is entitled to claim depreciation.

    Sangam Educational Society, C/O Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Versus Addl. CIT, Range-1, Ghaziabad

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13493 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=57613&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  4. Bombay High Court · 06 Sep 2017
    HC - Mining for the purpose of production of mineral ore falls within the ambit of the word ‘production’, entitling the assessee to the benefit of Section 32(A).

    The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Versus Sesa Goa Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13492 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69836&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  5. Bombay High Court · 06 Sep 2017
    HC - If a practice is followed (arbitrage transactions) and the same does not violate any law then the impugned loss amounts to hedging loss and constitutes business loss.

    The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) - IV Versus M/s. Riddi Siddhi Bullions Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13491 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69838&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  6. ITAT Mumbai · 04 Sep 2017
    Bogus Purchases: If the AO has not disputed the genuineness of sales and the quantitative details and the day to day stock register maintained by the assessee, a trader, he cannot make an addition in respect of peak balance of the bogus purchases. He can only determine the element of profit embedded in the bogus purchases. On facts, the addition is restricted to 2% of the bogus purchase

    ACIT vs. Steel Line (India)

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13490 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  7. Delhi High Court · 04 Sep 2017
    S. 263: Lack of inquiry vs. Inadequate inquiry: Revision on the ground that the AO did not conduct a detailed inquiry on account of paucity of time is unfair to the assessee and invalid (Amitabh Bachhan 384 ITR 200 (SC) & Maithan International 375 ITR 123 (Cal) distinguished

    Pr CIT vs. Mera Baba Reality Associates Pvt Ltd

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13489 (HC-DELHI) · Section 263

  8. ITAT Delhi · 04 Sep 2017
    ITAT - The section of public to whom benefit is intended is farmers constituting approx. 60% - 70% of population of country and the protection of interests of farmers will invariably confer several benefits. Society meets 'general public utility' criteria.

    Bhartiya Kisan Sangh Sewa Niketan vs. CIT(Exemptions)

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13488 (ITAT-DELHI)

  9. J&K High Court · 04 Sep 2017
    HC - Embezzlement loss by employees, to be allowed in year of ‘discovery' and not in the year of ‘detection'.

    J and K Bank Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13487 (HC-J&K)

  10. Delhi High Court · 01 Sep 2017
    HC - Television news software exported falls within the definition ‘customized electronic data’ occurring in clause (b) of the Explanation to Sec. 80HHE.

    CIT vs. NDTV

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13486 (HC-DELHI) · Section 80HHE

  11. Supreme Court · 01 Sep 2017
    S. 153A/ 153C: The seized incriminating material have to pertain to the AY in question and have co-relation, document-wise, with the AY. This requirement u/s 153C is essential and becomes a jurisdictional fact. It is an essential condition precedent that any money, bullion or jewellery or other valuable articles or thing or books of accounts or documents seized or requisitioned should belong to a person other than the person referred to in S. 153A. Kamleshbhai Dharamshibhai Patel 31 TM.com 50 (Guj) approved. SSP Aviation 20 TM.com 214 (Del) distinguished

    CIT vs. Sinhgad Technical Education Society

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13473 (SC) · Sections 153A, 153C

  12. Delhi High Court · 02 Sep 2017
    S. 115JB: As Insurance companies are required to prepare accounts as per the Insurance Act and not as per Schedule VI to the Companies Act, s. 115JB does not apply. Insurance companies are not taxed on commercial profits but on profits as computed under the Insurance Act. Accordingly, income earned on sale/redemption of investments is not chargeable to tax

    Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs. DCIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13472 (HC-DELHI) · Section 115JB

  13. Delhi High Court · 02 Sep 2017
    S. 68: The use of deceptive loan entries to bring unaccounted money into banking channels plagues the legitimate economy of our country. The mere fact that the identity of the lenders is established & payments are made by cheques does not mean they are genuine. If the lenders do not have the financial strength to lend such huge sums and if there is no explanation as to their relationship with the assessee, no collateral security and no agreement, the transactions have to be treated as bogus unexplained credits

    Pr CIT vs. Bikram Singh

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13471 (HC-DELHI) · Section 68

  14. Bombay High Court · 02 Sep 2017
    S. 68: Argument that the assessee did not maintain "books of account" and so s. 68 will not apply is not acceptable. It is incumbent on every assessee doing business to maintain proper books of account. It may be in any form. If the assessee has not done so, he cannot be allowed to take advantage of his own wrong. Burden lies on the assessee to show from where he has received the amount and what is its nature

    Arunkumar J. Muchhala vs. CIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13470 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 68

  15. ITAT Mumbai · 02 Sep 2017
    ITAT - Deduction allowable u/s 43B for stamp-duty paid on demerger.

    Mahyco Seeds Ltd vs. Dy.CIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13469 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 35DD, 43B

  16. ITAT Mumbai · 02 Sep 2017
    ITAT - No TDS u/s 194J on payment for subscription of e-magazine/journal by assessee engaged in carrying out research for private equity investments as the same is neither royalty nor FTS.

    Kitara capital Private Limited vs. ITO

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13468 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 194J

  17. ITAT Delhi · 02 Sep 2017
    ITAT - In case of remand of quantum addition to AO, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) should also be remanded.

    ST Microelectronics Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13467 (ITAT-DELHI)

  18. ITAT Delhi · 02 Sep 2017
    ITAT - Providing free air travel, stay and food in hotels, local car conveyance etc. for prescribing medicines of the assessee (a pharma company) is akin to giving commission and certainly in contravention of the public policy. Disallowance of 50% of sales promotion expenses justified.

    OCHOA Laboratories Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13466 (ITAT-DELHI)

  19. ITAT Delhi · 01 Sep 2017
    ITAT - Alleged gift of immovable property to her daughter should be treated as ‘sale’ and Sec. 50C applicabile.

    Smt. Balwant Kaur Mangat Vs ITO

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13465 (ITAT-DELHI)

  20. ITAT Delhi · 01 Sep 2017
    ITAT - DRP has powers to propose TP-adjustment even though AO/TPO did not propose such adjustment in the draft order.

    Bausch & Lomb India Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13464 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 263

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.