Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,867 rulings

  1. Kerala High Court · 30 Mar 2019
    HC - Actual loss due to cancellation of contract is allowable in the year of loss when arbitration proceedings are pending and have not become final. If at all in conclusion of the arbitration proceedings, the assessee receives any amount it could be adjusted in the loss of that year.

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), COCHIN VERSUS M/S. CHANDRAGIRI CONSTRUCTION CO.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17939 (HC-KERALA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=77135&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  2. Delhi High Court · 29 Mar 2019
    HC - Gateway charges are in the nature of fees for banking services and not 'commission' or 'brokerage' - No TDS u/s. 194H on payment gateway charges.

    Make My Trip India Pvt. Ltd Vs THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17938 (HC-DELHI) · Section 194H

  3. Allahabad High Court · 30 Mar 2019
    HC - Writ petition for stay of demand and release of bank account not admitted as statutory remedy to approach the ITAT is available to assessee.

    U.P. RAJYA VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LTD. THRU AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, LKO. & ANR.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17937 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=77136&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  4. Uttarakhand High Court · 29 Mar 2019
    HC - Sec.260A(6) enables the High Court to determine any issue which has not been determined by the Appellate Tribunal but it should involve a substantial question of law - Revenue's appeal dismissed as Revenue challenged AO's order first time before HC.

    Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd Vs Director Income Tax International Taxation

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17936 (HC-UTTARAKHAND)

  5. Bombay High Court · 30 Mar 2019
    HC - Deduction u/s 43B could not have been disallowed by insisting on a direct correlation between the duty paid and the goods manufactured.

    THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 PUNE. VERSUS SANDVIK ASIA PVT. LTD.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17935 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=77137&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  6. Bombay High Court · 29 Mar 2019
    S. 92C(1) Transfer Pricing: Even if the assessee does not report the specified transaction & the AO has no occasion to notice it, the TPO has no jurisdiction to suo moto determine the ALP. He has to call for a reference from the AO. Alternate remedy is not a bar if the action is without jurisdiction & can be severed from the rest

    Times Global Broadcasting Company Ltd vs. UOI

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17929 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 92C(1)

  7. Bombay High Court · 29 Mar 2019
    S. 271(1)(c) Penalty: Merely because the High Court has admitted the Appeal and framed substantial questions of law, it cannot be said that the entire issue is debatable one and under no circumstances, penalty could be imposed (CIT vs. Dharamshi B. Shah 366 ITR 140 (Guj) followed)

    PCIT vs. Rasiklal M. Parikh

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17928 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 271(1)(c)

  8. Bombay High Court · 29 Mar 2019
    S. 68 Bogus Share Capital: Merely because the investment was considerably large and several corporate structures were either created or came into play in routing the investment in the assessee through a Mauritius entity would not be sufficient to brand the transaction as colourable device. The assessee cannot be asked to prove the source of source (PCIT Vs. NRA Iron & Steel 103 TM.com 48 (SC) referred)

    PCIT vs. Aditya Birla Telecom Ltd

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17927 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 68

  9. ITAT Ahmedabad · 27 Mar 2019
    ITAT - Labour expenditure related to wife - It is not new that family members helping each other in doing business in their proprietor-ship concerns. If some salary is attributable to them on their working, then it should not be doubted simply for the reason that those family members are not aware about the raising of bills in their names - Expenses allowed.

    SHRI SHRIRAJ PANKAJ SHAH VERSUS ACIT, CIR. 5 (2) AHMEDABAD.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17909 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=72157&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  10. ITAT Delhi · 27 Mar 2019
    ITAT - When assessee has deposited complete tax before the assessment is made, the penalty u/s 271AAA to that extent cannot be levied.

    AVTAR SINGH KOCHAR VERSUS DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17908 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=72160&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  11. ITAT Delhi · 27 Mar 2019
    ITAT - Depreciation at 80% was available in respect of simplicitor electricity/energy measuring meters and there was no additional requirement of such meters being energy saving devices.

    BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. VERSUS ACIT CIRCLE 5 (1), NEW DELHI

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17907 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=72158&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  12. Karnataka High Court · 27 Mar 2019
    HC - The objections raised by the petitioner on 20.12.2018 to the summary of reasons recorded provided by the AO has not been disposed of by a speaking order - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 not valid.

    MPHASIS LTD. VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4 (1) (2)

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17906 (HC-KARNATAKA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=75827&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  13. Madras High Court · 27 Mar 2019
    HC - The manufacture of a herbal product by a manual process with the use of some chemicals and small machinery (but least consumption of electricity) can also amount to manufacture or production of a different commercial article which is the basic requirement under Section 80IA.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHENNAI VERSUS M/S. CAVINKARE PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17905 (HC-MADRAS) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=77098&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  14. Bombay High Court · 27 Mar 2019
    HC - TP adjustment - In relation to a specified domestic transaction, the TPO can undertake transfer pricing study only in relation to those transactions which are referred to him under sub-section (1) of Section 92C of the Act.

    TIMES GLOBAL BROADCASTING COMPANY LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17904 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=77099&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  15. Bombay High Court · 26 Mar 2019
    HC - IDS being a complete code in itself, credit of advance-tax, self-assessment tax not available against discharge of assessee's liability to pay tax, surcharge and penalty under IDS Scheme.

    Umesh D. Ganore Vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax­1

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 17903 (HC-BOMBAY)

  16. ITAT Chennai · 26 Mar 2019
    ITAT - Cash transactions in the current account of a company with its promoters, where such current account was a running one, could not be considered as loan or advances - No penalty u/s 271D.

    M/S. SPACE N PLACE PROMOTERS P. LTD. VERSUS THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE RANGE 6 CHENNAI

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16908 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=71155&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. ITAT Jaipur · 26 Mar 2019
    ITAT - When the assessee already furnished return of income before the date of search and also declared long term capital gain then none of the conditions as prescribed under clause (a) & (b) are satisfied so as to bring the case of the assessee in the mischief of Explanation 5A to Section 271(1)(c).

    DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA. VERSUS RAJENDRA AGARWAL

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16907 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=71158&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  18. ITAT Delhi · 26 Mar 2019
    ITAT - If the plea of the assessee that in case of a non-filer of tax returns, assessments cannot be reopened on the basis of AIR information that assessee has made huge cash deposits in the bank account is accepted, then the provisions of section 147 and 148 in the statute will become redundant.

    SMT. BILLO VERSUS ITO, WARD-1 (2), MEERUT.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16906 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=70797&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  19. Bombay High Court · 26 Mar 2019
    HC - The word 'Tax’ includes penalty and interest and as the burden of proof is shown on the directors to prove that they were not negligent etc., then it follows that the directors can be held responsible to pay penalty and interest when the company was liable to pay the penalty and interest u/s 179.

    NANDKISHOR KAGLIWAL, SHRIRANG S. AGARWAL, MOHAMMAD ZAMIR KHAN, VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 1, UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16905 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=76100&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  20. Madras High Court · 26 Mar 2019
    HC - In case of proceedings u/s 158BD, not raising any objection in the first instance by the Assessee is fatal.

    SMT. V. VIJAYALAKSHMI VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE II, COIMBATORE.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16904 (HC-MADRAS) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=76101&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.