-
Once the petitioner has satisfied the requirement of the law for providing PAN, Aadhar and also house tax receipt then the authority should not have insisted for submission of receipt of electricity bill.
Ranjana Singh vs. Commissioner of State Tax and 2 Ors.
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5745 (HC-ALLAHABAD)
-
Since the Petitioner is yet to execute the bond and furnish the sureties, the condition directing the accused to furnish the bank guarantee/FDR is also not sustainable, as normally, such a condition can be imposed in lieu of executing the bond.
Varinder Singh vs. Directorate General of GST Intelligence
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5738 (HC-P&H)
-
Superintendent has power to detain or seize the goods as well as the conveyance, but also has the power to release such goods and conveyance provisionally on furnishing bond or such security or payment as found appropriate.
Shri Tafiz Ali vs. State of Tripura & others
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5737 (HC-Tripura)
-
Section 169 of CGST Act, 2017 provides for service of notice by e-mail is an accepted mode of service.
Tvl. Gokul Traders vs. Deputy State Tax Officer (ST)
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5734 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Competent authority can pass a fresh order after allowing the assessee to file reply to show-cause notice.
Rimi Sales Agency vs. UOI
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5728 (HC-Tripura)
-
Body building and mounting of body on chassis supplied by Principal, on delivery challans, by collecting job-work charges for such fabrication work is taxable at 18%.
In the matter of Adithya Automotive Applications Pvt Ltd.
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5725 (AAR)
-
Given the scheme of the Act prescribing definite timelines for preferring an appeal and the lapse of right of appeal thereafter, the Appellate Authority would have to consider the circumstances asserted and would also have to decide on the merits of the matter.
P. Venu Gopal Reddy vs. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors.
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5724 (HC-KARNATAKA)
-
Applicant is not liable to registration under section 23 of the CGST Act as the applicant is exclusively engaged in the supply of exempt goods/services.
In the matter of Hazrath Valiyaparambil Azeez
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5723 (AAR)
-
The era of GST is nascent and a rigid view should not be taken in procedural matters such as the present one.
Carlstahl Craftsman Enterprises Private Limited Vs. Union of India
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5722 (HC-MADRAS)
-
The order, passed above, shall not preclude the Central GST authorities to proceed in accordance with law and to continue with any proceedings that have been initiated by them.
Raj Metal Industries & Anr. vs. UOI & Ors.
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5721 (HC-CALCUTTA)
-
Since investigation is still underway, therefore bail is being rejected of the accused in connection with ITC fraud case.
Amit Kumar Shukla v. Union of India
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5720 (HC-BOMBAY)
-
The petition cannot be entertained and leaves it to the Petitioner to approach the statutory authority to seek further extension.
Vitta Samanvaya Samiti vs. UOI & Ors.
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5719 (HC-RAJASTHAN)
-
Petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs before the State Tax Officer as also a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one local surety, subject to certain conditions.
Sanjay Kumar vs. State of Gujarat
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5718 (HC-GUJARAT)
-
Liability cannot be waived when provisions of the Act are unambiguous.
T. Karthick Raja vs. The General Manager
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5717 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Revenue’s stance that the transaction involving the assessee was suspicious and that the transporter was without proper documents, is utterly perverse and cannot be sustained.
Vijay Metal vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5716 (HC-AP)
-
Applicants shall be released on regular bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety in the like sum to satisfaction of Trial Court.
Rohan Tanna vs. Union of India
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5715 (HC-CHHATTISGARH)
-
The Court can, and should exercise its powers, under Article 226 of the Constitution, amongst others, in cases where the impugned action or order concerned is without jurisdiction.
Roshni Sana Jaiswal vs. Commissioner of Central Taxes
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5713 (HC-DELHI)
-
What is sought for by the Petitioner is revival of of registration only, and in the guise of considering the application for revocation, the authorities cannot embark upon the process of assessment.
Ramkrishna Mahalingam vs. State Tax Officer
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5710 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Filing of counter-affidavit is directed within 4 weeks.
Federation of Indian Small Scale Battery Associations (Regd.) vs. Union of India
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5709 (HC-DELHI)
-
Assessee cannot feign ignorance, when it is implicit that the assessee obtained the credentials of defunct firms and handed over the same to other accused for being misused for cheating the exchequer.
Bajan Lal Bishnoi vs. The Superintendent of GST & Central Excise
(2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 5708 (HC-MADRAS)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.