Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

GST landmark rulings

5,409 rulings

  1. AAR · 14 Apr 2021
    The product in hand consisting of milk flavored with Badam/Elaichi/Kesar/Rose being ready for consumption beverages based on Milk is specifically excluded under CTH 0402, and not being ‘Whey’, it is not classifiable under CTH 0404 either.

    In the matter of Vadilal Industries Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6338 (AAR)

  2. AAR · 14 Apr 2021
    The Supplier of Applicant does not fulfil/satisfy all the conditions required for being a ‘Pure agent’ in terms of provisions of Rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

    In the matter of Enpay Transformer Components India Pvt Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6337 (AAR)

  3. AAR · 08 Jun 2022
    Diesel is covered under Entry 54 to the List II of the Schedule VII to the Constitution of India and therefore it is excluded from levy of GST and hence beyond the scope of Chapter XVII of the CGST Act, 2017.

    In the matter of Singareni Collieries Company Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6335 (AAR)

  4. AAR · 08 Jun 2022
    If Applicant’s total collection of monthly maintenance charges plus annual fee called sinking fund exceeds Rs. 7500 for July or August month, GST is leviable.

    In the matter of Jayabheri Orange County Owners Association

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6334 (AAR)

  5. Madras High Court · 08 Jun 2022
    If the petitioner is eligible to claim the said ITC, it become certain that, the petitioner can very well claim that ITC from the concerned jurisdictional State GST Authority, where the petitioner Head Office is located.

    Travancore Mats and Mattings Pvt. Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6333 (HC-MADRAS)

  6. AAR · 21 Apr 2021
    The GST paid on the procurement of promotional items supplied to the EBOs/franchisees and distributors free of charge will not be eligible for input tax credit since the said supply is a non-taxable supply.

    In the matter of Page Industries Limited

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6332 (AAR)

  7. AAR · 22 Apr 2021
    GST@18% is chargeable on applicant’s work of retro fitting, restoration etc. of civil structures predominantly for Government, Public Sector Undertakings and Government entities.

    In the matter of PSK Engineering Construction Co.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6331 (AAR)

  8. AAR · 22 Apr 2021
    Applicant is eligible for availing ITC on GST paid for setting up of Fire Water Reservoir and not on Pile Foundation as the same is entrusted as separate work and not the foundation required for the Water Storage Tanks and are not a part of Plant and Machinery.

    In the matter of SHV Energy Pvt Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6330 (AAR)

  9. AAR · 21 Apr 2021
    Appellant is liable to pay IGST @18% on reimbursement of expenses to Parent/Holding Company for settlement of credit card liability under reverse charge basis as per Notification No. 10/2017.

    In the matter of ICU Medical India LLP

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6329 (AAR)

  10. Supreme Court · 21 Apr 2021
    Revenue is duly empowered to provisionally release the seized goods, if the requirements of section 67 (6) of the CGST Act read with rule 140 of the CGST Rules are satisfied.

    Union of India & Ors. vs. Palak Designer Diamond Jewellery

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6328 (SC)

  11. Supreme Court · 20 Apr 2021
    Unless there was a change in the circumstances, it was not open for JC to pass another order of provisional attachment, after the earlier order of provisional attachment was withdrawn considering assessee’s representations.

    Radha Krishna Industries vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6327 (SC)

  12. Delhi High Court · 20 Apr 2021
    Status quo, as obtaining today, shall be maintained qua the petitioner.

    Yellow Sun Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6326 (HC-DELHI)

  13. AAR · 20 Apr 2021
    Applicant will have to register themselves as a tax- deductor under provisions of Section 24 of CGST Act, 2017 only upon fulfillment of condition of 51%, or more participation of Government by way of equity or control, to carry out any function.

    In the matter of National Institute of Design, Paldi, Ahmedabad

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6325 (AAR)

  14. AAR · 20 Apr 2021
    Supply of goods i.e. fender panel system along with services such as assembly, installation & supervision service would not qualify as a composite supply or a mixed supply.

    In the matter of Trelleborg Marine Systems India Pvt. Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6324 (AAR)

  15. AAR · 20 Apr 2021
    Room rent for patients in hospital is exempted in terms of Circular No.27/01/2018-GST and the food supplied to the in-patients, as advised by the doctor/nutritionist, is a part of composite supply of health care and not separately taxable.

    In the matter of Shalby Limited

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6323 (AAR)

  16. Delhi High Court · 07 Jun 2022
    The taxable turnover of the petitioner was Rs.15,28,468/-, which is below the threshold limit of Rs.20,00,000/- fixed for tobacco products.

    Kishore Kumar Arora vs UOI & anr

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6321 (HC-DELHI)

  17. Allahabad High Court · 07 Jun 2022
    Since the circumstances are unique and not such as may be blamed on the assessees, the State would not raise any objection to limitation if the appeal/s is/are filed by aggrieved assessees, within reasonable time.

    Kaydee Audio Vision Pvt Ltd. Vs. State of UP & Ors.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6320 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  18. Tripura High Court · 06 Jun 2022
    As per Rule 138(10) and in particular second proviso thereof, e-way bills can either be amended or reissued for the selfsame consignment, but bona fide reasons for such change must be justified.

    Progressive Enterprise vs State of Tripura and others

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6319 (HC-Tripura)

  19. Delhi High Court · 06 Jun 2022
    There is no stay of the proceeding, yet the time for filing the reply before NAPA is extended by a period of two weeks from today.

    Tata Play Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6318 (HC-DELHI)

  20. Allahabad High Court · 06 Jun 2022
    Instant matter is pertaining to large evasion of tax and to investigate the matter in depth the possibility of custodial interrogation of the applicant could not be ruled out.

    Shishir Gupta @ Parul Gupta vs. UOI

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6317 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.