Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

GST landmark rulings

5,407 rulings

  1. AAR · 07 Nov 2022
    Applicant owns the digital platform for supply of goods or services or both and squarely fits into the definition and qualifies to be ECO.

    In the matter of Multi-Verse Technologies Pvt Ltd

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6866 (AAR)

  2. Allahabad High Court · 07 Nov 2022
    Where SCN proposing suspension of GST registration has been issued due to the proceedings initiated against the assessee for violation of the provisions in issuing invoice or bill without supply of goods & wrongful availment of the benefits, assessee cannot seek the interference of writ court without furnishing any reply to the show cause notice.

    DM Traders vs UOI vs anr

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6865 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  3. Bombay High Court · 07 Nov 2022
    Managing Director of Company shall not be exempted from appearing and shall appear before the concerned authorities as and when summoned and fully co-operate.

    Suumaya Industries Ltd vs UOI & Ors

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6864 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. Bombay High Court · 07 Nov 2022
    Concerned officers Perhaps do not have proper training on adjudication matters or they are not even aware about the legal provisions or need to follow principles of natural justice.

    Archana Textile Corporation vs. State Of Maharashtra

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6863 (HC-BOMBAY)

  5. AAR · 04 Nov 2022
    Questions, on which the applicant seeks advance ruling, are not in relation to the supply of goods or services or both but in relation to the service/s being received by them.

    In the matter of Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation Ltd

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6856 (AAR)

  6. AAR · 04 Nov 2022
    Supply of annual operation and maintenance of capacity portable compactor and hook loader to Howrah Municipal Corporation is eligible for exemption if the value of goods involved in such composite supply does not exceed 25% of the value of supply.

    In the matter of Banchu Das

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6855 (AAR)

  7. AAR · 04 Nov 2022
    There is no bar on the registered tax payer to claim ITC on input services and corresponding expenses and capital goods while being under Margin Scheme.

    In the matter of Attica Gold Pvt Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6854 (AAR)

  8. Supreme Court · 04 Nov 2022
    To hear Sutherland Global's matter on Cess transition on November 25.

    Sutherland Global Services Ltd vs. Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise & Ors.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6853 (SC)

  9. Karnataka High Court · 03 Nov 2022
    Merely because that the petitioner has an option of seeking revocation under Section 30 it cannot be said that independent of the said remedy of seeking revocation an appeal would not be maintainable.

    Shailaja Chandrashekar vs Addl. Commissioner of Central Tax (A)

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6850 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  10. AAR · 03 Nov 2022
    Appellant’s principal supply is production and distribution of electricity, which is exempt from payment of GST.

    In the matter of Achampet Solar Private Ltd

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6849 (AAR)

  11. AAR · 03 Nov 2022
    Industrial safety belt manufactured by the applicant is classifiable under chapter 6307 as other made up articles, including dress patterns, liable to tax at 5% where sale value does not exceed Rs. 1000 per piece and 12% in other case.

    In the matter of Singha Baheni Industries

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6848 (AAR)

  12. AAR · 03 Nov 2022
    Work undertaken by the applicant fails to get covered under serial number 3(iv)(a) of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28-6-2017, as amended.

    In the matter of Shree Powertech

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6847 (AAR)

  13. AAR · 03 Nov 2022
    Seed produced by seed company from food grain by way of processing is not agricultural produce in terms of definition contained in Notifications No. 11/2017-CT(R) and No. 12/2017-CT (R).

    In the matter of Ganga Kaveri Seeds Pvt Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6846 (AAR)

  14. Chhattisgarh High Court · 02 Nov 2022
    Appellate Authority is directed to examine whether in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner can be extended benefits of amendment made in Section 50.

    Abis Export India vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6842 (HC-CHHATTISGARH)

  15. Allahabad High Court · 02 Nov 2022
    Revenue’s argument that it had received intelligence that the goods are being transported twice over on the same set of invoices is not worthy of acceptance, inasmuch as, the goods to be transported have to be accompanied by E-way bills as provided under Section 138.

    State Of U.P vs Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Pvt Ltd

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6841 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Section 129(3)

  16. AAR · 02 Nov 2022
    Partnership contract must be read as a whole and not in isolation for gathering the intention of parties.

    In the matter of HYT Engineering Company Pvt Ltd.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6840 (AAR)

  17. Allahabad High Court · 01 Nov 2022
    There is no provision under section 129 for determination of tax due, which can be done only by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 73 or 74.

    Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs State of U.P.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6838 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Section 129

  18. Gujarat High Court · 31 Oct 2022
    The date of filing of the application by the Assessee on common portal would be liable to be treated as date of filing claim for refund to the satisfaction of requirement of Section 54 of CGST Act and Rule 89 of CGST Rules.

    Chromotolab and Biotech Solutions vs. Union of India

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6832 (HC-GUJARAT)

  19. Calcutta High Court · 31 Oct 2022
    There is no requirement for the electronic credit ledger to contain sufficient balance for the purpose of blocking the credit by invoking Rule 86A(1) of CGST Rules, 2017.

    Basanta Kumar Shaw vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Commercial Taxes And State Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6831 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  20. Uttarakhand High Court · 31 Oct 2022
    As no absolute rule is laid down that in the matters pertaining to the Act, custodial interrogation is not required, therefore, it cannot be said that anticipatory bail has to be granted in each and every case, in which a person is summoned under Section 70 of the Act.

    Rajesh Kumar Dudani vs State of Uttarakhand & anr.

    (2022) TaxCorp(IDT) 6830 (HC-UTTARAKHAND)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.