Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

GST landmark rulings

5,404 rulings

  1. AAR · 30 Jun 2023
    AAAR - Classification and Taxation of Advertisement Services Modified by Telangana AAAR - Vivisection of Selling Space for Advertisement Not Permitted, Additional Services Classified as 'Advertising Services', Taxable at 18%

    In the matter of Time Education Kolkata Pvt. Ltd.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7732 (AAR)

  2. Gujarat High Court · 30 Jun 2023
    Gujarat High Court: Transfer of Documents from Issuing Authority to Investigating Officer

    Vipulchandra Pursottamdas Mahant Prop of Vaibhavi Construction vs Asst Commissioner of State Tax

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7731 (HC-GUJARAT)

  3. Bombay High Court · 30 Jun 2023
    Bombay High Court: Arbitrary Cancellation of CGST Registration Due to Improper Notice and Breach of Natural Justice.

    Mayel Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7730 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. AAR · 28 Jun 2023
    Fortified Rice Kernels is nothing but preparation of rice flour and it is classifiable under CH 1904.

    In the matter of Brindavan Agrotech Pvt Ltd.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7717 (AAR)

  5. AAR · 28 Jun 2023
    It gets abundantly clear that if specified commodities are supplied in a package that do not require declaration/compliance under Legal Metrology Act, 2009, and the rules made thereunder, the same would not be treated as pre-packaged and labelled for the purpose of GST levy and rice supplied in pre-packaged form would fall in the definition of pre- packaged commodity.

    In the matter of Satyam Balajee Rice Industries Pvt Ltd

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7716 (AAR)

  6. MP High Court · 28 Jun 2023
    After sale of metal scraps to the assessee through e-auction, the supplier defaulted by not reporting the auction sales invoice duly paid by the assessee in the return under GSTR-1 due to which the auction sale invoice was not reflected in the assessee’s GSTR-2A. Thus assessee entitled to seek the return from supplier.

    Agrawal and Brothers vs UOI & ors

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7715 (HC-MP)

  7. Allahabad High Court · 28 Jun 2023
    The maximum punishment under Section 132(1)(a) of the Act, 2017 is five years which is triable by Magistrate.

    Vivek Mishra vs. UOI

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7714 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  8. AAR · 28 Jun 2023
    It is clear that in the instant case, as no supply has happened during the GST regime as per Section 142(10) of the act ibid no GST shall be payable. Further the additional payment received by way of compensation through award by Hon’ble Tribunal for Arbitration is not falling under Section 142(2)(a) and hence not chargeable to GST.

    In the matter of TPSC (India) Pvt Ltd

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7713 (AAR)

  9. Madras High Court · 28 Jun 2023
    Order of assessment shall be treated as a show cause notice by the petitioner.

    Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. vs. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) & Ors.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7711 (HC-MADRAS)

  10. Calcutta High Court · 27 Jun 2023
    A communication is privileged if it is made to a legal advisor by a client after the commission of a crime and with a view to his defence but not so if made before the commission of the crime or wrong and for the purpose of being guided or assisted in furthering or committing it.

    Himangshu Kumar Ray vs State of West Bengal

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7705 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  11. AAR · 27 Jun 2023
    Applicant is eligible to take full credit of GST charged and is not required to reverse ITC to the extent of financial/commercial credit notes issued by the supplier as the amount received by the applicant is in the form of post supply discount and it will not affect transaction value between supplier and applicant.

    In the matter of Vedmutha Electricals India Pvt. Ltd.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7704 (AAR)

  12. AAR · 26 Jun 2023
    GST would be applicable on the supply of pre-packaged and labelled rice upto 25 kgs in all these scenarios viz on export to a foreign buyer, on supply to the exporter on ‘bill to ship to’ basis (bill to exporter and ship to customs port), on supply to the factory of exporter.

    In the matter of Sri Seetharamnjaneya Sortex.

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7702 (AAR)

  13. Karnataka High Court · 23 Jun 2023
    The impugned orders of attachment are declared to be no longer in operation from the expiry of the period of one year as stipulated under Section 83(2) of the Act.

    Sri Om Traders vs. Principal Additional Director

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7695 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  14. AAR · 21 Jun 2023
    There is definite service being provided by IVL Sweden located outside India that enables the Applicant to perform the. Services under contract therefore, there is no doubt that the services are being supplied in taxable territory i.e. India.

    In the matter of IVL India Environmental R&D Pvt Ltd

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7680 (AAR)

  15. AAR · 21 Jun 2023
    The support services received by the Appellant from IVL Sweden will come under the ambit of import of services as the said services fulfill all the criteria of the import of services and therefore, the same shall be liable to IGST under RCM.

    In the matter of IVL India Environmental R&D Pvt Ltd

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7678 (AAR)

  16. Madras High Court · 20 Jun 2023
    It was incumbent upon the officer to fix the matter for hearing, heard the petitioners and thereafter determined the tax payable.

    Sri Krishna Timbers & Ors. vs. State Tax Officer

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7674 (HC-MADRAS)

  17. AAR · 20 Jun 2023
    It does not show NEEM Trainer’s authorization to Appellant to make payment of stipend as its ‘pure agent' and neither does the Company own the payment of stipend to the trainees as its liability, both of which are essential first condition of Rule 33.

    In the matter of Beeup Skills Foundation

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7673 (AAR)

  18. Gujarat High Court · 20 Jun 2023
    If the appeal is allowed by the Appellate Authority, it is always open for the petitioner to make such request before the Appellate Authority that direction be issued to the respondents to refund the amount.

    Stallion Energy Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7672 (HC-GUJARAT)

  19. AAR · 20 Jun 2023
    To qualify as a trade discount, the same must be known prior to removal of goods however, in the present case, the quantum of discount was not known at the time of removal of goods rather that was linked to the purchases done by the Appellant from the authorised distributors of Intel.

    In the matter of MEK Peripherals India Pvt Ltd

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7671 (AAR)

  20. Jharkhand High Court · 20 Jun 2023
    When no detailed adjudication order, as required under Section 73 (9) of JGST Act, 2017, has been passed or issued to the Petitioner, the Petitioner is not liable to pay any tax, interest or penalty only on the basis of the said Form DRC-07.

    Shree Ram Agrotech vs State of Jharkhand

    (2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7670 (HC-JHARKHAND)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.