-
The mere fact that payments have been received through cheque cannot give any credence so as to genuineness of the transactions.
Krishna Devi Vs Income Tax Officer
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28149 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
We uphold the order of the ld. CIT(A), as we do not find merit in the appeal filed by the assessee.
M/S. ARUN SHINDE VERSUS ITO, WARD-3 (3) , PUNE
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28148 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94956&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Impugned Notice u/s 148 are wholly without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary, and liable to be quashed.
SHARVAH MULTITRADE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4 (3) (1) & ANR.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28147 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86314&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
Where on consideration of material on record, one view is conclusively taken by the AO it would not be open to reopen the assessment based on the very same material with a view to take another view.
RAVI KANAIYALAL SHETH VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5 (3) (1) & ORS.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28146 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86315&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
We are satisfied that petitioner had truly and fully disclosed all material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment.
VODAFONE IDEA LTD. (SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST OF M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD.) VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, UNION OF INDIA
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28145 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86317&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
Using the words 'failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts', is clearly made only as an attempt to take the case out of the restrictions imposed by the proviso (1) to section 147 of the Act.
BENNETT PROPERTY HOLDINGS COMPANY LTD. VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 (1) (1) AND TWO ORS.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28144 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86318&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
It is not even prima facie the case of the Assessing Officer that there was failure on part of petitioner to fully and truly disclose all material facts, this Court has to interfere by exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
STCI FINANCE LTD. VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 (3) (1) , MUMBAI AND ANR.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28143 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86320&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
Increase in the sales resulting into the higher profit could not be the reasons to hold the expenditure to be of capital nature.
Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd Vs Dy. Commi ssione r of Income Tax
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28142 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Even the participation by the Assessee in the assessment proceedings would also not make any difference because the facts remains that the assessment order has been passed by the assessing officer in the name of a nonexistent company.
Accenture Solutions Private Limited (ASOL) (As a Successor to Accenture Services Private Limited Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28141 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
There was no material whatsoever produced by the Assessee to disprove the conclusions drawn by Revenue and positively prove that it purchased machineries in question for R&D and that it carried out R&D activities.
The Official Liquidator in case of M/s. Jupiter Bioscience Limited Vs DCIT
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28140 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 35(2)(ia)
-
Under sec. 273B of the Act, the penalty u/s 271B shall not be imposable, if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure to comply with the provisions of sec.44AB.
M/S. SLV HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VERSUS ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (2) BANGALORE
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28139 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94916&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
In the present case, there is no prima-facie opinion formed by the Assessing Officer before issue of notice under Section 148 of the Act; therefore, the reopening of the assessment is bad in the eyes of law.
SMT. MEENABEN DILIPKUMAR SONI VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5 (2) (5) , AHMEDABAD
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28138 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94918&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
We do not find any merit in the grounds of appeal raised by Revenue.
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI VERSUS RADHE FLUD
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28137 (ITAT-SURAT) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94924&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
There is no dispute with regard to the proposition that whenever unaccounted receipts unearthed during any investigation, then the gross receipts are not to be taxed.
DCIT, CIR. 4 (1) (1) AHMEDABAD. VERSUS SAMBHAV INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28136 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94926&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
We allow the grounds raised by the assessee with regard to inflated expenditure by way of sub-contract payments in all the appeals under consideration.
MADHUCON PROJECTS LTD., HYDERABAD. VERSUS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 3, HYDERABAD.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28135 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94928&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
When there is no change in income assessed the order of AO cannot be said to be prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
KAMAL VYAS VERSUS PCIT-17, MUMBAI
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28134 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94933&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
The assessee would be entitled to claim bad debts as well as fall in value of inventory as deduction, subject to satisfaction of the conditions for such allowance laid down in the Act.
Middleby Celfrost Innovations Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28133 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
-
Even in terms of Section 50D, cost of construction would not be the appropriate method to arrive at the full market value of consideration.
Shankar Vittal Motor Co. Ltd. & Another Vs THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28132 (HC-KARNATKATA)
-
The transfer petitions have become infructuous in view of the new Scheme and also the application for intervention is being disposed of.
LAKSHYA BUDHIRAJA & ANR. ETC. Vs CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ETC.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28131 (SC)
-
DRP’s directions to delete the TP addition is being upheld.
GBT India Pvt. Ltd Vs National E–Assessment Centre
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28130 (ITAT-DELHI)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.