Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,824 rulings

  1. ITAT Pune · 15 Feb 2022
    Failure of the assessee to deduct tax at source from payment made to the Netherlands entity clearly magnetizes section 40(a)(i) of the Act.

    VANDERLANDE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE-13, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28370 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95581&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  2. ITAT Delhi · 15 Feb 2022
    The plea of the assessee is not acceptable.

    SMT. LATA GARG VERSUS THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, DELHI.

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28369 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95583&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  3. ITAT Bangalore · 14 Feb 2022
    In order to fall within the ambit of FTS, the service providers should have made available, to the Assessee, the technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how etc.

    Wipro Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28368 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 195

  4. Gujarat High Court · 14 Feb 2022
    If any steps are taken for recovery, Assessee may file an application before the AO requesting to keep the demand in abeyance and grant stay on recovery atleast till the time the application that may be filed by the writ-applicant under Section 119 before the Chief Commissioner is decided one way or the other.

    Rajkamal Healds And Reeds Pvt. Ltd Vs ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28367 (HC-GUJARAT) · Section 119(2)(b)

  5. Bombay High Court · 14 Feb 2022
    Revisionary jurisdiction is not as wide as appellate jurisdiction, at the same time cannot be confused with power of review, which is limited in nature.

    Hapag Lloyd India Pvt. Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28366 (HC-BOMBAY)

  6. Madras High Court · 14 Feb 2022
    A mere statement that the land was situated in urban area and the agriculture was not carried out at the relevant point of time could not be concluded as suppression.

    H. Ameerdeen Vs The Income Tax Officer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28365 (HC-MADRAS)

  7. ITAT Surat · 14 Feb 2022
    Provision of section 133A(4) prohibits the income tax authority to remove cash, stock or other valuable article and it is only upon non-cooperation or refusal by the person under search that power under section 131(1) can be resorted.

    RAJ ENTERPRISE VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, SURAT.

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28364 (ITAT-SURAT) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95558&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  8. ITAT Delhi · 14 Feb 2022
    The assessee is entitled to claim the benefit of deduction u/s 54 of the IT Act on account of sale of the property and the subsequent investment in the residential property.

    CHARU AGARWAL VERSUS DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) , CIRCLE GURGAON. AND (VICE-VERSA)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28363 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95560&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. ITAT Chennai · 14 Feb 2022
    The loss arising in the process of conversion of foreign currency, which is part of trading asset of the assessee, is a trading loss as any other loss.

    THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NON-CORPORATE CIRCLE-I (1), CHENNAI VERSUS M/S. KUNNAM GRANITE WORKS

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28362 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95567&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  10. Calcutta High Court · 14 Feb 2022
    Since the credit balance appearing in the accounts of the assessee does not pertain to the year under consideration, therefore assessing officer was not justified in making the addition under Section 68 of the Act.

    PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA VERSUS M/S. MAHALUXMI MARKETING PVT. LTD.

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28361 (HC-CALCUTTA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86539&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  11. Rajasthan High Court · 14 Feb 2022
    All the notices issued in the present cases are after 01.04.2021 and have been issued without following the procedure contained in Section 148A of the Act and are therefore invalid.

    RATAN KUMAR BANSAL HUF VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 (2) , NEW CENTRAL REVENUE, UNION OF INDIA

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28360 (HC-RAJASTHAN) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86540&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  12. Calcutta High Court · 14 Feb 2022
    When a donor trust which is a charitable trust donates its income to another trust, the provisions of Section 11(1)(a) can be said to have been met by such donor trust and the donor trust can be said to have applied its income for religious and charitable purposes.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS) , KOLKATA VERSUS NAWAL KISHORE KEJRIWAL CHARITY TRUST, ALKING CHARITY TRUST, ALWAR CHARITY TRUST, ASHOK KUMAR MEMORIAL TRUST, LAKSHMI TRUST

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28359 (HC-CALCUTTA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=86544&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  13. ITAT Mumbai · 12 Feb 2022
    Non filing of return for proper period and not in appropriate status is not at all a procedural mistake, it is quite substantial mistake.

    Achal Housing LLP Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28358 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  14. ITAT Indore · 12 Feb 2022
    As tax was deducted at source, the payments were genuine and the source of the expenditure was also satisfactorily explained by the assessee.

    M/s. Agrawal Construction Co. Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28357 (ITAT-INDORE)

  15. ITAT Raipur · 12 Feb 2022
    As per the settled position of law, it was not permissible for an assessee to raise a fresh claim for deduction otherwise than by filing a revised return of income.

    Shri Raja Vikram Vs The Income Tax Officer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28356 (ITAT-RAIPUR) · Section 54B

  16. ITAT Mumbai · 12 Feb 2022
    There was no liability to deduct tax at source since no income was chargeable to the recipient.

    Viacom 18 Media Private Limited Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28355 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  17. ITAT Bangalore · 12 Feb 2022
    Depreciation claimed by the Assessee on goodwill acquired deserves to be allowed.

    M/s. Altimetrik India Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28354 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  18. ITAT Mumbai · 12 Feb 2022
    Difference in the ready reckoner rate and the sale consideration was within the 5% tolerance band and hence needs to be ignored.

    Spenta Enterprises Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28353 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 43CA

  19. ITAT Delhi · 12 Feb 2022
    Each AY is separate and, therefore, judgment adjudicated in one AY on the basis of substance before them cannot be regarded as binding in the assessment of subsequent years.

    Bentley Nevada Inc. Vs The Dy. C.I.T

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28352 (ITAT-DELHI)

  20. Bombay High Court · 11 Feb 2022
    The reasons for proposed re-opening clearly indicates that Respondent No. 1 wants to re-open only on the basis of change of opinion which, as held time and again by various Courts, cannot be a ground for reopening.

    Tata Sons Limited Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28351 (HC-BOMBAY)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.