Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,824 rulings

  1. ITAT Mumbai · 19 Feb 2022
    The CIT(E) has erred in exercising revisional jurisdiction on the ground that the AO has failed to make necessary enquiries with regard to the nature of investments made by the Assessee.

    Sir Ratan Tata Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28410 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  2. ITAT Chennai · 19 Feb 2022
    The resultant loss incurred by the Assessee was rightly claimed as revenue expenditure and thus revenue is directed to allow the deduction as claimed by the Assessee.

    Refex Industries Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28409 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  3. Bombay High Court · 19 Feb 2022
    There is no material to justify the formation of reason to believe that income escaped assessment.

    Tata Sons Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28408 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. ITAT Delhi · 19 Feb 2022
    Assessee is eligible for benefit under Section 54.

    Charu Agarwal Vs DCIT (International Taxation)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28407 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 54

  5. Bombay High Court · 19 Feb 2022
    Once all the primary facts are before the assessing authority, he requires no further assistance by way of disclosure.

    Nishith Madanlal Desai Vs Commisioner of Income Tax-1(3)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28406 (HC-BOMBAY)

  6. ITAT Mumbai · 19 Feb 2022
    Mere filing of SLP in the Hon’ble Supreme Court would not disturb the legal issue settled by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court.

    D.Y. Patil Educational Academy Vs DCIT 2(1)(2)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28405 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  7. ITAT Delhi · 19 Feb 2022
    The finding of learned CIT(Appeals) that the assessee has not provided break up of dividend is erroneous. Therefore, same cannot be sustained and assessing officer is directed to delete the addition.

    Jaswant Singh Uberoi Vs JCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28404 (ITAT-DELHI)

  8. ITAT Bangalore · 19 Feb 2022
    Milk parlours cannot be considered as godowns or warehouses contemplated u/s 80P(2)(e).

    Hassan Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Union Ltd Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28403 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 80P(2)(e)

  9. ITAT Delhi · 18 Feb 2022
    When tax rate is prescribed under DTAA, education cess is not leviable.

    Magotteaux International SA Vs The Dy. C.I.T

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28402 (ITAT-DELHI)

  10. ITAT Pune · 18 Feb 2022
    Income under capital gains is taxable in the year of transfer and further that transfer takes place only when it becomes operational, that is, on executing the sale deed.

    Beena Shammi Chaudhari Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28401 (ITAT-PUNE)

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 18 Feb 2022
    We are in agreement with the findings of the Assessing Officer and we sustain the addition proposed by the Assessing Officer.

    ACIT – 31 (1) , MUMBAI VERSUS M/S. ECOHOMES TOWNSHIP LLP

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28400 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95642&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  12. ITAT Mumbai · 18 Feb 2022
    Assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year, therefore no disallowance can be made u/s. 14A of the Act when assessee has not earned any exempt income.

    ACIT – CIRCLE – 3 (1) (2) , MUMBAI VERSUS M/S. EIPR INDIA PVT. LTD.

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28399 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95643&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  13. ITAT Delhi · 18 Feb 2022
    The receipts arising from transfer of carbon credits are in the nature of capital receipts not subjected to tax.

    SRF LIMITED VERSUS ASST. CIT, CIRCLE-1 LTU NEW DELHI

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28398 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95644&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  14. ITAT Pune · 18 Feb 2022
    If the amount of employees' contribution towards EPF, ESI, etc is delayed by an employer beyond the due date under the respective Acts, the disallowance will be called for notwithstanding the fact that it was deposited before the due date u/s. 139 of the Act.

    POWERLINK ENGINEERS LLP VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE-2 NASHIK

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28397 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95648&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  15. ITAT Delhi · 18 Feb 2022
    The commission income belonged to the HUF and rightly returned by it. Therefore, correct hand for taxing such income is HUF and not the assessee.

    MANISH GUPTA VERSUS THE DY. C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE MEERUT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28396 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95651&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  16. ITAT Pune · 18 Feb 2022
    A piece of legislation which imposes a new obligation or attaches a new disability is considered prospective unless the legislative intent is clearly to give it a retrospective effect.

    GRI RENEWABLE INDUSTRIES S.L., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GONVARRI EOLICA S.L., VERSUS ACIT (IT) , CIRCLE-1, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28395 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95655&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Bombay High Court · 17 Feb 2022
    The refund application will be processed and refund orders will be issued within two weeks from today.

    Tata Communications Limited Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28394 (HC-BOMBAY)

  18. Supreme Court · 17 Feb 2022
    In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the instant case, we direct that the appellant be given benefit of the amounts deposited towards first two instalments while reckoning the tax liability of the appellant after revised assessment.

    Yogesh Roshanlal Gupta Vs CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28393 (SC)

  19. ITAT Indore · 17 Feb 2022
    The foreign supplies have not exceeded the threshold time limit to constitute the PE as specified in the respective DTAA and finding of both the lower authorities of constituting PE of the vendors in India deserves to be set aside.

    Birla Corporation Limited Vs ITO (IT & TP)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28392 (ITAT-INDORE)

  20. ITAT Delhi · 17 Feb 2022
    Estimated revenue for the year and the percentage of project completed was not disputed by the AO, and thus it was not open for the CIT(A) to take a contrary view in the remand proceedings without any corroborative evidence on record.

    Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd Vs Dy. CIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28391 (ITAT-DELHI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.