Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,819 rulings

  1. ITAT Delhi · 23 Mar 2022
    DTAA provisions don’t require state of residence to eliminate the double taxation in all cases where state of source has imposed tax by applying a provision of convention on an income that is different from view of state of residence.

    Dynamic Drilling & Services Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28664 (ITAT-DELHI)

  2. Delhi High Court · 26 May 2021
    HC - Faceless assessment order passed prior to expiry of date given to assessee for filing response to SCN-cum-draft assessment order quashed.

    Renew Power Private Limited Vs NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28659 (HC-DELHI)

  3. ITAT Delhi · 26 May 2021
    Since the original assessment in that case had been completed by following the procedure prescribed u/s.144C, in the remand proceedings, the AO could not bypass the provisions of the said section.

    A.T. Kearney Ltd Vs ADIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28658 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 144C

  4. ITAT Indore · 28 May 2021
    In the instant case, there is a common shareholders amongst all the four companies having substantial interest and voting power of more than 10%.

    Ryder Trans International Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT-4(1)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28657 (ITAT-INDORE) · Section 2(22)(e)

  5. Madras High Court · 28 May 2021
    The intimation dated June 13, 2017 is well within the knowledge of the AO.

    K.Suresh Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28656 (HC-MADRAS) · Section 148

  6. ITAT Mumbai · 28 May 2021
    Considering the explanation provided by the assessee, it could not be said that it is a fit case for imposition of penalty.

    Subhash Shah And Associates Architects Pvt. Ltd Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28655 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  7. ITAT Mumbai · 25 May 2021
    Once a possible view has been taken by the ld AO, his order cannot be termed as erroneous warranting revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act.

    Grasim Industries Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28654 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  8. ITAT Mumbai · 25 May 2021
    Where certain disallowances have been dropped, it cannot be said that the assessment has been completed as per the draft order without there being further hearing, directions, or application of mind.

    Galaxy Surfactants Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28653 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 144C(3)

  9. ITAT Delhi · 24 May 2021
    The claim of provision as made by the assessee is in accordance with settled principal of law. Therefore, the authorities below were not justified in making the disallowance.

    BSC C&C Kurali Toll Road Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28652 (ITAT-DELHI)

  10. Bombay High Court · 24 May 2021
    Not being parties to the appeals, they were not competent to make the applications for transfer. In such circumstances the applications for transfer of appeals were invalid and on such invalid applications no order for transfer of appeals could have been passed.

    MSPL Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28651 (HC-BOMBAY)

  11. ITAT Surat · 28 May 2021
    When a non-resident agents operate outsides the country no part of his business arise in India, and payment is remitted directly abroad, and merely because an entry in the books of accounts was made, it does not mean that the non-resident had received any payment in India.

    Broach Textile Mills Ltd Vs The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28650 (ITAT-SURAT) · Section 195

  12. ITAT Bangalore · 22 Mar 2022
    As regards the rendering of services by the employees for payment of bonus/commission, the only requirement of Section 36(1)(ii) is that some services should have been rendered, which was established by Revenue itself.

    Sasken Technologies Limited Vs JCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28649 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  13. MP High Court · 22 Mar 2022
    The procedure laid down in Section 148A is required to be adhered to for reassessment notices issued on or after Apr 1, 2021.

    Yuvraj Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28648 (HC-MP) · Section 148A

  14. Chhattisgarh High Court · 22 Mar 2022
    At the stage of issuance of notice for reopening of assessment, the Court is only to see whether there was prima facie material on the basis of which department could reopen the case and not the sufficiency or correctness of material to be considered.

    Bharat Krishi Kendra Vs Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28647 (HC-CHHATTISGARH) · Section 151(2)

  15. Bombay High Court · 21 Mar 2022
    Remuneration and interest from partnership firm cannot be treated as gross receipt.

    Perizad Zorabian Irani Vs Principal Commisioner of Income-Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28640 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 44AB

  16. Delhi High Court · 21 Mar 2022
    The Assessee had filed his replies to the notices that were not considered while passing the impugned order which in turn states that despite giving several opportunities the Assessee had not filed any reply/response.

    Mayur Batra Vs ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28639 (HC-DELHI)

  17. Allahabad High Court · 21 Mar 2022
    Mere signing of the notices cannot be equated with issuance of notice as contemplated under section 149 of the Act.

    Daujee Abhushan Bhandar Pvt. Ltd Vs Union Of India And 2 Others

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28638 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Section 148

  18. Delhi High Court · 31 May 2021
    The assessee being a POA holder cannot be treated as rightful owner of the income, which has arisen on sale of a particular property.

    Bankimbhai D. Patel Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28631 (HC-DELHI)

  19. Delhi High Court · 31 May 2021
    As per provisions of Sec. 144B the Revenue was required to issue a show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order when there is a difference in the declared and assessed income.

    Lokesh Constructions P Ltd Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28630 (HC-DELHI)

  20. Delhi High Court · 28 May 2021
    Had the show cause notice cum draft assessment been served on the petitioner, its authorised representative could have requested for a personal hearing in the matter.

    YCD Industries Vs NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28629 (HC-DELHI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.