Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

ITAT Delhi — Direct Tax

1,949 rulings

  1. ITAT Delhi · 30 Apr 2022
    The subscription fee is not royalty but merely a consideration for online access of the cloud computing services for process and storage of data or run the applications.

    Microsoft Regional Sales Pte. Ltd Vs DCIT (International Taxation)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28966 (ITAT-DELHI)

  2. ITAT Delhi · 30 Apr 2022
    Amount demanded by NPPA cannot fall in the category of payment made for a purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law.

    T.C. Healthcare P. Ltd. Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28964 (ITAT-DELHI) · Sections 37(1), 43B

  3. ITAT Delhi · 29 Apr 2022
    A person who is not a non-resident for relevant AY cannot be taxed through a representative assessee by invoking Section 163.

    Moin Akhtar Qureshi Vs The ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28956 (ITAT-DELHI)

  4. ITAT Delhi · 23 Apr 2022
    The cloud hosting services is not taxable as royalty or FTS under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA.

    M/s. MOL Corporation Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28925 (ITAT-DELHI)

  5. ITAT Delhi · 23 Apr 2022
    The onus to establish what were the agreed terms and conditions of services which were provided the term of execution of the project was on the Assessee, and that the Assessee failed to establish the same.

    Wuhan Research Institute of Post and Telecommunication India Vs ADIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28916 (ITAT-DELHI)

  6. ITAT Delhi · 20 Apr 2022
    The profit derived from providing baggage screening services and aircraft handling services to other airlines as a participant of IATP pool would be covered under Article 8(1) read with Article 8(4) of India–USA DTAA.

    United Airlines Vs DCIT, DDIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28904 (ITAT-DELHI)

  7. ITAT Delhi · 19 Apr 2022
    Revenue failed to appreciate the Articles of the Verein which were relevant to understand the composition and operation of Verein for the benefit of the Members.

    Deloitte Touche Tohmastu Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28895 (ITAT-DELHI)

  8. ITAT Delhi · 09 Apr 2022
    Since the Assessee is offering only 60% of surveillance fee as income, the claim of TDS should mandatorily be restricted to the extent of 60% income and the balance should be allowed in the subsequent assessment year.

    Credit Analysis and Research Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28808 (ITAT-DELHI)

  9. ITAT Delhi · 09 Apr 2022
    No technical consultancy or managerial service being provided by Google or Apple to the Assessee, and such payments were not chargeable to tax in India.

    Trulymadly Matchmakers Private Limited Vs Income-tax Officer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28807 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 195

  10. ITAT Delhi · 09 Apr 2022
    TDS being one of the modes of payment of taxes, claim for TDS credit can give rise to a claim for refund even in case where there is no assessable income in the corresponding year.

    Kema India Private Limited Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28803 (ITAT-DELHI)

  11. ITAT Delhi · 05 Apr 2022
    Assessee does not satisfy the make available requirement as per Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA so as to make it taxable in India as FIS.

    Everest Global Inc. Vs DDIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28769 (ITAT-DELHI)

  12. ITAT Delhi · 05 Apr 2022
    HISWAL’s assessment was concluded on the basis of HISWAL having a PE in India, however in the instant case, there is nothing on record to suggest that HCSL had a PE/ business connection in India.

    Asian Hotels North Ltd Vs ITO (Intt. Taxation)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28768 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 195

  13. ITAT Delhi · 04 Apr 2022
    There was no liability of tax on payments made for advertising services to Facebook since it had certified that it has no PE in India and is a resident of Ireland for tax purposes.

    Lenskart Solution (P) L. Vs Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28760 (ITAT-DELHI)

  14. ITAT Delhi · 02 Apr 2022
    In the circumstance we have no agitation in restoring the entire assessment to the assessing officer for de novo adjudication.

    Alcatel Lucent Portugal, SA Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28748 (ITAT-DELHI)

  15. ITAT Delhi · 31 Mar 2022
    In a third party scenario and in a comparable transaction, no person or entity would have invested in AJL’s shares which is a non-operational and non-income generating company.

    Young Indian Vs ACIT (E)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28737 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 28(iv)

  16. ITAT Delhi · 29 Mar 2022
    The income earned by the Assessee from the Indian customers with respect to the subscription fees for CRM cannot be taxed as royalty as per section 9(1)(vi) as well as Article 12(3) of the treaty.

    Salesforce.com Singapore Pte Vs The Dy. D.I.T

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28722 (ITAT-DELHI)

  17. ITAT Delhi · 28 Mar 2022
    The collection charges paid by AAI to the Assessee, nothing but service charges paid for collecting UDF and passing it on to AAI., which cannot be said to be the income derived from operation of aircraft falling under Article 8 of the DTAA.

    Lufthansa German Airlines Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28714 (ITAT-DELHI)

  18. ITAT Delhi · 26 Mar 2022
    Since, the annual value determined is devoid of any rational endorsement, we hereby delete the addition made by the revenue authorities.

    Sunil Kumar Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28701 (ITAT-DELHI)

  19. ITAT Delhi · 26 Mar 2022
    Linking the claim of depreciation to production in the midst of manufacture progression is against the legislative intent.

    The Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd Vs Addl. CIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28699 (ITAT-DELHI)

  20. ITAT Delhi · 25 Mar 2022
    Domestic law cannot be read into treaties, unless treaties are amended bilaterally.

    B.T. Global Communications India Pvt. Ltd Vs The Dy. C.I.T

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28688 (ITAT-DELHI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.